University senate votes no confidence against Wildes
January 21, 2016
At the university senate meeting on Jan. 21, senators raised and confirmed a vote of no confidence in the Rev. Kevin Wildes, S.J., university president.
At the meeting, faculty met with Marc Manganaro, university provost, and Loyola board members to discuss changes to get the school out of its current deficit. The meeting covered everything from staff and faculty retirement protocol, and what the school plans to do with the future student body and tuition.
The highlight of the meeting wasn’t about the faculty’s new age requirement for retirement, but the vote that solidified less faith towards the board of trustees and Loyola’s president. The votes piled in at 38-10 votes for “no confidence” against Wildes.
The faculty did not hold back their opinions during the meeting. Board members addressed the lack of Wildes’ public appearances, and their firm strategy to keep him in place as the school’s president, but that didn’t stop people from expressing how they felt, especially professors such as John Levendis, associate professor of economics.
“If this was a company or business, or any other school, someone would’ve gotten fired by now,” Levendis said.
The board members that were in attendance at the senate hearing knew that the faculty were voting and said if staff voted against Wildes, then that would “impede” in any of the university’s progress. Whatever they thought they could do to sway the faculty’s opinion didn’t do much.
During the meeting, one faculty member asked, “what do you see in Wildes that makes you want to keep him in place as our leader?” A board member replied, “we see results.”
This vote comes after being postponed last semester to this first meeting of the semester.
Dr. Stephen M. Scariano • Jan 26, 2016 at 10:15 am
This is now the second vote of “NO CONFIDENCE” in Kevin W. Wildes, S.J. At every turn his lackluster “leadership” has led Loyola farther and farther down the road of financial crisis, and possibly exigency.
After Hurricane Katrina, not only was there a vote of “NO CONFIDENCE”, but the Loyola administration was ultimately CENSURED by the AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS (AAUP). Only later, after multiple large dollar lawsuits against Loyola were settled, did the AAUP remove Loyola from their list of censured administrations. At that time, some thought the removal premature. Of course, we now know the “rest of the story.”
Regardless of what the Board of Trustees (BOT) says or does, a second vote of “NO CONFIDENCE” demonstrates “a house divided – again”, which obviously has been festering for about ten years. The BOT must know that when the workers (faculty) reach this point, the organization is faltering, so change should occur to return to an optimal state. Certainly, the BOT knows that Kevin Wildes is not the catalyst Loyola needs at this point in time. If not, then perhaps it is time for a vote of “NO CONFIDENCE” in the BOT.