Middle children overlooked

Dear Editor:

I could not help but feel mildly offended by Ramon Vargas’ February 1 column, “Manning Survives Criticism.” His lead, though intriguing, is a blanket statement that casts a negative light on middle children, paying no heed to their many positive qualities. According to careerbuilder.com, “Middle children are more easygoing and peer-oriented … Middle children often take on the role of mediator and peacemaker.” Peer-oriented? I suppose that could explain Eli Manning’s success as a team player. I have learned that Mr. Vargas is the baby-I mean youngest-in his family. This is unsurprising. He has made a typical move of the youngest child, as they are commonly “very charming, even manipulative.” His delightful wit and charisma may appear to defend middle children by showcasing Manning’s success, but he only states that Manning breaks a stereotype. Manning’s lack of respect on the field only proves that middle children often go overlooked and may not receive proper credit for their accomplishments.I have no doubt that Mr. Vargas will continue a successful career in the field of journalism, as that is also a reported strong point of youngest children. That said, in the future I hope he can refrain from subjecting to stereotypes in his quest to create catchy leads. I’m sure Mr. Vargas is satisfied in knowing named Super Bowl Most Valuable Player. After all, youngest children frequently do “identify with the underdog.”Sincerely,Anna MalleyEnglish literature, senior